Published Sep-24-2009
The idea behind the CPI is to gauge overall price changes by selecting a set of items that represents what the average consumer buys, and then tracking the prices of those items as they rise and fall over time. The set of items includes frequently purchased items, such as food and clothing, as well as less commonly purchased items, such as televisions and tires.
Complications arise, however, when trying to use just one index to reflect the prices faced by different groups of consumers. For instance, a working consumer will probably spend a larger portion of income on clothes and transportation than a retired consumer will, and a consumer in San Francisco will probably spend more on rent than a consumer in Portland. To adjust for differing prices faced by consumer groups, the BLS creates a number of price indexes. This article provides a brief history of the CPI, discusses a few of the different indexes, compares recent trends in consumer prices in Oregon and in the nation, and illustrates how the CPI affects workers in Oregon.
It is possible for the index to come down as consumer prices fall. This rare event is called deflation and has occurred in recent months, brought on by the drop in oil prices after 2008's steep price increases. A long-term decline in the average annual price index however has not occurred since 1955. The last extended period of deflation was during the Great Depression, when prices dropped in five out of 10 years in the 1930s, and fell almost 10 percent in 1932 alone!
More people are likely to remember the period of high inflation in the early 1980s, when high oil prices caused double-digit percentage increases in the CPI for three consecutive years. Since then, the annual growth rate in the CPI has hovered in the 1 to 5 percent range.
The CPI-U and the CPI-W use the same price data, but the weights that are given to each item when computing the indexes are different. The weight of an item represents its share of spending in the average consumer's total expenditure. The assumption is that the average working consumer will have different spending patterns than the population in general and will be affected by price changes differently depending on which items' prices change.
Different weights are calculated for 87 geographic areas as well. These areas are usually metropolitan statistical areas or a combination thereof, hence the CPI's claim to represent only urban consumers. The national CPI is reported as the city average of these areas, and averages for national regions are reported as well.
Table 1 compares the most recent Portland-Salem weights with the U.S. city average. Once again, the figures in Table 1 are for shares of total consumption, and do not compare prices of items across regions. The figures in the "point difference" columns are positive if Portland-Salem consumers spend a larger share of their income on the item compared to the U.S. city average, and negative if they spend a smaller share.
The table shows that, in general, residents in the Portland-Salem area spend a smaller portion of their expenditures on household energy than the rest of the country. Portland-Salem area consumers spend a higher portion on housing than the U.S. city average. Transportation for the average consumer is also a larger share of expenditures in Portland-Salem, especially for those earning wages, who are apparently paying to transport themselves to work.
| 2005-2006 Weighted Importance of Components in the Consumer Price Index | ||||||||
| U.S. City Average | Portland-Salem | Point Difference | ||||||
| Expenditure | CPI-U | CPI-W | CPI-U | CPI-W | CPI-U | CPI-W | ||
| Food and beverages | 15.757 | 16.942 | 15.367 | 16.271 | -0.390 | -0.671 | ||
| Shelter | 33.200 | 31.224 | 33.504 | 32.825 | 0.304 | 1.601 | ||
| Household energy | 4.460 | 4.996 | 3.070 | 3.124 | -1.390 | -1.872 | ||
| Household - Other | 5.761 | 5.094 | 5.736 | 4.465 | -0.025 | -0.629 | ||
| Apparel | 3.691 | 3.979 | 3.323 | 3.358 | -0.368 | -0.621 | ||
| Transportation - minus motor fuel | 12.150 | 13.038 | 13.035 | 14.809 | 0.885 | 1.771 | ||
| Motor fuel | 3.164 | 4.029 | 3.767 | 5.014 | 0.603 | 0.985 | ||
| Medical Care | 6.390 | 5.355 | 5.956 | 5.014 | -0.434 | -0.341 | ||
| Recreation | 5.741 | 5.454 | 7.225 | 5.743 | 1.484 | 0.289 | ||
| Education and communication | 6.301 | 6.221 | 5.820 | 6.168 | -0.481 | -0.053 | ||
| Other goods and services | 3.386 | 3.668 | 3.197 | 3.208 | -0.189 | -0.460 | ||
| All Items | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 | ||||
| Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics | ||||||||
The figures in Table 2 reveal that the rate of price decrease in Portland-Salem over the year was -0.2 percent, slightly less than the Western urban and U.S. city average decreases of -0.6 percent. The average annual increase in Portland-Salem since 2000 was 2.2 percent, less than the Western urban and U.S. city averages of 2.9 percent each. Over the previous eight years, prices in Portland-Salem rose 21 percent, less than the U.S. city average increase of 25.7 percent.
The trend of Oregon prices rising more slowly than national prices has not always been the case (Graph 1). Way back in the 1990s, Portland-Salem prices rose faster than U.S. city average prices every year.
| Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Recent Changes | |||||||
|
Jan-Jun 2009 CPI-U |
Jan-Jun 2008 CPI-U |
CPI-U Change | 2000-2008 Change | ||||
| Area | Total | Annual Average | |||||
| U.S. City Average | 213.139 | 214.429 | -0.6% | 25.7% | 2.9% | ||
| U.S. West Urban | 217.786 | 219.016 | -0.6% | 25.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Portland-Salem OR-WA | 214.102 | 214.619 | -0.2% | 21.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics | |||||||
Oregon workers have a particularly close tie to the CPI because Oregon law links the minimum wage rate to the CPI. Oregon's law, which took effect in 2004, is tied to the national CPI-U. In the fall, the state's minimum wage rate for the upcoming year is recalculated using the percentage increase in the August-to-August CPI figure, if there was an increase.
The minimum wage increased each year through 2009 along with the increases in consumer prices. The August 2009 CPI-U index was lower than the August 2008 CPI-U index so consumer prices fell over the year for the first time since the law took effect. The minimum wage law is tied only to increases in the CPI-U and not decreases, so the minimum wage will remain at $8.40 per hour in 2010.

